citrinitas_668: (#668)
Citrine ❬#668❭ ([personal profile] citrinitas_668) wrote2008-09-06 02:15 am
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry
Entry tags:

✗35

If an existence's sole purpose is to serve as anti-existence to another existence, would the elimination of one existence also be the end of the other? If there is nothing to be the anti- of, after achieving the goal of eliminiation, what will be left?
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

[identity profile] hrlsoldier.livejournal.com 2008-09-06 06:31 am (UTC)(link)
No, because of the ... the effort that went into you, right?

But even if it's not the same 'you,' it's still the ... same person, because... it's just like a name change. It doesn't change your nature. Just because you were a weapon made to kill one person doesn't mean you'll break in his chest, right? Then you'll be the same weapon, wielded for a different purpose.

[identity profile] citrinitas-668.livejournal.com 2008-09-06 06:35 am (UTC)(link)
You sound like Rubedo. A little. It's eerie.

[identity profile] hrlsoldier.livejournal.com 2008-09-06 07:06 am (UTC)(link)
Hm.

I do not want to sound like him.


I am going to hold a barbecue on the beach sometime soon, I think. Would you like to come? You can bring any of your friends.

[identity profile] citrinitas-668.livejournal.com 2008-09-06 07:08 am (UTC)(link)
It isn't really a bad thing, right now. Just that thing about protecting being your purpose... he abandoned his duty and claimed that protecting someone was more important than his real purpose.

...A barbecue? ...I don't mind, I guess. And I have no 'friends' to begin with, so I don't think that will be an issue.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only